Mark Advertises Footer links at the http://www.wikileaks-forum.com for Sale in December 2011, using the aliases Soul Assassin & Infusionx
A Journey In Support of WikiLeaks and Julian Assange

Mark Advertises Footer links at the http://www.wikileaks-forum.com for Sale in December 2011, using the aliases Soul Assassin & Infusionx
Selling PR 6 Forum in World Events niche

Mark Advertises the http://www.wikileaks-forum.com for Sale for the second time in November 2011, using the alias Infusionx
Selling Large PR 5 Forum looking for a new owner – high traffic

Mark Advertises the http://www.wikileaks-forum.com for Sale for the first time in September 2011, using the alias Infusionx
Here I republish Cabledrum’s account of the facts relating to his banning from ‘The Official WikiLeaks Forum’ in May 2012 and the deletion of his posts. I will be soon giving a personal account of what I know regarding these events.
I have included in brackets a web page (a post by Green) that I have archived for good order’s sake. Green was my forum mod nick. In the Page that have archived my Mod nick name is captioned as ‘Guest’ this is because I deleted this account in Aug/Sep 2012. At the time that I wrote this post I was a mod with co-ordinator role for the Forum’s Volunteer Translation Project and I had been given the ‘title’ Language Co-ordinator.
Verbatim From Cabledrum’s WebPage: https://www.cabledrum.net/wlf.html
Update [May 18, 2012]: On May 17, I published the following correspondence via Twitterand Facebook after having waited one week in vain for an answer. In response to this publication, WikiLeaks Forum now has banned me from accessing the forum and blockedme on Twitter. This is the only “answer” I got up to now.
Update 2 [May 19, 2012]: WikiLeaks Forum now has deleted all content ever posted by me even outside the “cabledrum” board, including WikiLeaks press releases, Cablegate listings, cable analysis etc., a total of more than 300 postings with over 40,000 page views.
Update 3 [May 21, 2012]: WikiLeaks Forum has posted a statement, (http://archive.is/Zjfhi) claiming that all my postings would have “accidently been deleted” and could not been recovered automatically. In response I offered to recover the cabledrum board posts from my backup.
Update 4 [May 24, 2012]: WikiLeaks Forum has refused my offer to recover the cabledrum board posts from my backup and blocked my IP address from reading Forum posts.
Subject: The Al-Manar case From: cabledrum To: isis, C, qubit, Z, sawz, Green, ariana Date: May 09, 2012, 06:31:30 PM Dear WLF team, As you probably know, my moderator permissions got revoked and the "cabledrum" board was taken offline without prior notice. Why? On April 25, I posted a highly controversial article from the Lebanese media organization Al-Manar, regarding the Nasrallah interview on "World Tomorrow". Al-Manar, which is affiliated with Hezbollah, is banned in several countries, including Germany (where WLF is operating from) and the US (where WLF server is hosted). I've also posted an opposing article from Jerusalem Post. As a result, I have been accused for posting illegal content "in spite of Z's warnings about it's anti-constitutional character". I'm accused to have "grossly violated" the board rules and to have endangered both WLF and Z this way. But: This posting was made with Z's approval. I informed him in advance and asked for his permission to post this article. We've discussed the posting details for over an hour, particularly the legislative situation (which wasn't mentioned by Z but by me). Finally, Z explicitly permitted me to post the Al-Manar article. Shortly after it was posted, I asked Z again, if the posting is ok this way. He told me that he worries about it and wants to discuss the issue with the other admins. During this chat, the posting was removed by C. On this point, I've stated again that I accept this decision. Over the next three days, we dicussed the legal situation and possible alternatives. Finally, on April 28, Z posted a copy of the Al-Manar article from another website on his own and without my knowledge. This posting was removed 3 hours later. Assuming that I did post that article "in spite of Z's warnings" (which in fact isn't the case): Why did Z post a copy of it afterwards? In response to this issue, the "cabledrum" board was taken offline. This board contains a number of valuable postings, all mentioned by WikiLeaks on FB/Twitter, and got more than 10,000 page views. There was never any problem with this board. Even if any of the above accusations against me were true (which isn't the case): Would it justify this degree of censorship? Even the postings of banned users remain online. I am punished for something I haven't done. And even if I had done it (which isn't the case) it would not justify the sentence. Since I have been accused and sentenced without any opportunity to defend myself, this internal PM should be an acceptable remedy and should not be understood as offensive intervention. I still try to hope on some strange misunderstanding. Cabledrummer
Subject: Re: The Al-Manar case From: Z To: isis, C, qubit, cabledrum, sawz, Green, ariana Date: May 09, 2012, 06:45:30 PM the cabledrum board will remain closed. greetz Z
Subject: Re: The Al-Manar case
From: suspect
To: isis, C, qubit, Z, cabledrum, sawz, Green, ariana
Date: May 10, 2012, 05:09:04 PM
This is Cabledrummer. I have to write from another account since the
cabledrum account got banned from sending messages, in response to my
attempt to contradict.
Quote from WLF Mission Statement:
Quote from: Z on May 24, 2011, 12:08:07 PM
The forum stands for the values Wikileaks has defended since its
creation, such as freedom of speech and information.
[..]
We encourage constructive dialogues.
Unfortunately, WikiLeaks Forum fails to comply with its own standards.
Decision-making lacks any transparency, dialogue is unwanted, criticism
is forbidden, complaints are silenced. This is not what WikiLeaks stands
for. And this is not the spirit of a free open community I'm dreaming of.
I strongly support the idea of WikiLeaks in the best possible way, I did
before WLF and I will continue. Sadly, I'm prevented from sharing my work
on WLF now and I'm not even allowed to ask for a reason.
At this point, I stop wasting my time with begging for fair treatment.
Cabledrummer
Subject: You have received a warning From: The Official WikiLeaks Forum To: cabledrum Date: May 10, 2012, 05:37:41 PM cabledrum, You have received a warning for inappropriate activity. Please cease these activities and abide by the forum rules otherwise we will take further action. Regards, The The Official WikiLeaks Forum Team.
On the 31st October 2013 a group of WikiLeaks supporters came together outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in Knightsbridge London to commemmorate 500 Assange days of resistance to an unjust persecution. He entered the Ecuadorian Embassy on 19th of June 2012 and found there refuge to live in safety and continue his WikiLeaks Publishing work.
We have a lot to be thankful for, as the Ecuadorians have offered him political asylum. From a small nation came a gesture that shrank giants into mice. The UK government on the other hand refuse to allow him safe passage. The foreign office under William Hague even threatened Ecuador with the removal of Embassy status and a raid on the embassy was only just prevented. Furthermore, the Swedish Prosecution Authority has shown no interest what so ever in questioning him about the allegations against him. In the meanwhile, the British Taxpayer has furnished the entire cost of the Swedish Extradition Prosecution through the British Courts. It has also paid and continue to pay for the costs of guarding Assange with police presence 24/7 outside and inside the building that houses the Ecuadorian Embassy.
For over a year concerned supporters, have taken every opportunity to highlight Assange’s condition and stand in solidarity with him by attending a vigil outside the Embassy. On the 31st of October the vigil aquired a Halloween theme and the usual suspects were joined by another group of individuals, giving it a party atmosphere.
A very friendly Facebook Event Page Assange 500 – Halloween vigil at the Ecuadorian Embassy By Emese brought many new faces to Hans Crescent 🙂
Posters, flyers, masks and cake, Banners, bunting, tweets and tape
Flowers, card, some treats and tricks
With Warm Wishes for WikiLeaks
And with Spirits high and Strong:
“Thank you! Viva Ecuador”
You can find some beautiful pictures of the event by ChelseyLibera here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/64728140@N02/sets/72157637169473626/with/10598728403/
September 20, 2011
9/20, 10:25pm Emmy B****** still up?
9/20, 10:26pm Ma Rk yeahh hi
9/20, 10:26pm Emmy B****** hi me too but not for long
9/20, 10:27pm Ma Rk ah…u off to sleep then
9/20, 10:27pm Emmy B****** goodnight
9/20, 10:28pm Ma Rk awwww well have a nice sleep say hello to UK from me
9/20, 10:29pm Emmy B****** ah, we had the first cool day today, proper authumn
9/20, 10:29pm Ma Rk same here
9/20, 10:30pm Emmy B****** but thank goodness still sunshine UK is good
9/20, 10:30pm Ma Rk lol…makes all the difference
9/20, 10:30pm Emmy B****** apart from the weather yes, it is always a bit strange for me communicating like this with someone I don’t know, I might get used to it, I might not.
9/20, 10:32pm Ma Rk well….its no different on the forumn
9/20, 10:36pm Emmy B****** let the shop do a special sticker – for fundraising for what you need for the forum
9/20, 10:36pm Ma Rk yes..the forum need to nove to own VPS ( virtual private server )
9/20, 10:38pm Emmy B****** make a budget and get limited edition stickers, lets say 100 special tickets/stickers and sell them – then when you reach your target hopefully you can get your money from the shop but there is a problem there I just bought a sticker recently, the cost included 13 euro VAT (to the taxman)
9/20, 10:39pm Ma Rk hmm……I think this will take a long time possibly lol !!! damn !!
9/20, 10:39pm Emmy B****** and around 5 euros transport a very expensive way of making a donation, I thought
9/20, 10:40pm Ma Rk there is a online payment seystem ppl can donate per SMS or dcredit card I need to work it out first
9/20, 10:40pm Emmy B****** worthwhile it is easier to fundraise if you have something tangible like this
9/20, 10:41pm Ma Rk yeahh…im looking for this
9/20, 10:46pm Emmy B****** I do not fancy standing with a bucket at Tesco’s for WL – lol
9/20, 10:47pm Ma Rk ha ha ha noooo maybe sainsburys ?
9/20, 10:47pm Emmy B****** we have Waitrose where I live but Aldi too (I shop at both)
9/20, 10:48pm Ma Rk ohhh,,,,,,,what about BUDGEN ?
9/20, 10:48pm Emmy B****** never heard of them, what are they?
9/20, 10:49pm Ma Rk like waitrose supermarket chain
9/20, 10:50pm Emmy B****** maybe I have heard of them but do not operate – hang on I will google them 8 miles from where I live is the closest
9/20, 10:52pm Ma Rk u see ! everywhere
9/20, 10:54pm Emmy B**** hm, I will ask my english friends about them. I am glad yo mention them, you sound more human
9/20, 10:54pm Ma Rk ha ha
9/20, 10:56pm Emmy B***** hmhmhm
9/20, 11:02pm Emmy B****** I have done fundraising for my daughter’s school but nothing like this
9/20, 11:03pm Ma Rk I dont think anyone has
9/20, 11:04pm Emmy B****** I also deal with all the charities we support at my local church (yes do not raise eyebrows pls, I do go you know…) I have piles of letters with requests to donate
9/20, 11:04pm Ma Rk yeah…well its not much we need to raie and Im sure we will make the money we nee dto get this online
9/20, 11:05pm Emmy B****** yes I think so it is not much Mark?
9/20, 11:10pm Ma Rk no I think it wont be that much of a problem
9/20, 11:10pm Emmy B***** apart from VPS hardwhere are there other associated costs ?
9/20, 11:10pm Ma Rk none thats all we need
9/20, 11:12pm Emmy B***** I don’t know if that is possible because you know I am useless with these things, but would a second hand one do? if the spec matched
9/20, 11:12pm Ma Rk no…The forum has to be manage by someone 24 / 7 the support at hostgator is unmatched so far
9/20, 11:13pm Emmy B****** I am sorry with the purchase also comes a service is this what you mean?
9/20, 11:14pm Ma Rk yes…very important
9/20, 11:14pm Emmy B******* it is not a piece of hardware that you keep under your desk?
9/20, 11:14pm Ma Rk forum gets 500,000 – 750,000 hits a day
9/20, 11:20pm Emmy B****** ok, I have printed the page, will learn a bit about what it is all about, then if I have any ideas, I will let you know. Can you pay by installments?
9/20, 11:21pm Ma Rk yes i thin its 129 $ a month…sheeezuz..we have 8,000 members to ask
9/20, 11:38pm Emmy B******* hm, ok, let me think about this. Goodnight for now, speak to you soon
9/20, 11:38pm Ma Rk ok…well thanx for dropping by have a good sleep see ya soon
This is a second post focusing on the commercial aspect of wikileaks-forum.com. The first you can find here: http://wp.me/p2MRYW-j4
Searching in the website https://forums-digitalpoint.com for more clues as to the commercial objectives of the owner of the wikileaks-forum.com I have stumbled onto a total of three advertisements for the Sale of the forum, References 1-3 below. The table I made based on the information on the adverts clearly indicates that Mark kept putting the forum up for sale since September 2011, testing the water for responses and offers, probably exploring to monetize its value. That is to say he was dipping his toe in the market to see what the market wants and how much it was prepared to pay. As time went by, his offer was enhanced through higher number of posts, a blog, Facebook, Twitter supporter pages/accounts and VPN hosting to obtain,it seems, a better monetary value.
Summary of the three advertisements
| 7th September 2011 | 14th November 2011 | 26th August 2012 | |
| Page Ranking | PR5 | PR6 | PR6 |
| No of Posts | 17,500 | 21,000 | 34,000 |
| Threads | 12,000 | ||
| Members | 7,227 | 10,000 | 14,600 |
| Page views/day | 200,000-350,000 | ||
| Page views/month | 4,000,000 | ||
| Site Hits | 6,000,000 | ||
| Daily new members | 60-70 | 50-60 | |
| No of moderators | 30 | 20 | |
| New Daily posts | 100-150 | ||
| Facebook Page | 20,000 | 25,000 | |
| Twitter Page | 700 | 1,300 | |
| VPS | No | No | Yes |
| Hosting Costs | Owner | Owner | Paid through Community |
| Backlinks | Yes | 2000 | Yes |
| Blog -PR6 | Yes |
At the same time as these adverts were going up on the web, he was considering other offers of Finance including WikiLeaks financing the site [4], or raising money to cover the high VPN charges (estimate $129/month) through direct donations from membership [5].
Selling Advertising space at the forum through Footer links
But these were not the only options for consideration open to Mark. On the same day as he asks assistance in determining why wikileaks-forum.com with established PR6, shows no Google ranking at all in SSL[6], he advertises Selling 2-3 Advertising Footer Links to finance the site [7].
This is an example of a Footer Advertising link at the Forum back in May 2013 [8]:
if you pressed on the link ‘Techical Advisor’ it would take you to http://www.sawz.com/ a link submission website. Sawz was the name of a Forum Admin throughout the time that I was a moderator (31st Oct 2011 – 22nd Aug 2012). Mark had explained that since he was helpful to him he put his link there. He said he was not earning anything from that Footer Link. I also recall a second Footer link there at the time when I was a mod linked to ‘a throat, ear and nose specialist Consultant’, again Mark had plausibly explained that his presence there was due to the fact that he had built this doctor’s website, so this doctor was helping him cover some of the hosting costs.
At the time of writing, no footer advertising links appear at the Index page of the wikileaks-forum.com.
The Many Questions that must be asked
So the questions we have to ask are: why was Mark running the forum if he no longer had the time to do so as mentioned in the advertisements? Why did he advertise as early as September 2011 to sell it? Why he never told any of the mods/admins at the time of his attempts to sell but he was keeping it a secret? Why was it so important for a political discussion forum to have a PR6 Google ranking, why was finance an issue when there were early offers from WikiLeaks to cover the costs as long as the forum was hosted with a safe hoster away from the US?
What is the value of a WikiLeaks Forum (endorsed or not)
But would Mark make a fortune commercially by selling the forum? I am not acquainted with the commercial value of a forum. Some advertising revenue could be made in general by forums/blogs that openly solicit advertising. But, I would say that as a commercial venture I can’t see it turning someone a millionaire overnight. Still, the advertisements are clear proof he was looking for money in the open market as if it was a commercial venture. If someone can provide some insight, it would be very much welcome.
Also, the ‘For sale’ advertisements could act as a negotiating tactic with whoever he was talking to, in relation to the future of the forum. He could just want to recover what he spent. It could also be an exit strategy for Mark. He may no longer wished to have, openly, the responsibility for the role that the forum would play as the anti-WikiLeaks, anti-Julian Assange ‘Supporters’ Forum. A team of disaffected ‘Insiders’.
In fact, I would say that the real value of a WikiLeaks related forum would not be monetary. Whether endorsed or not it could only be of real value either to members of the WikiLeaks Supporters Community (as a supportive site) or to those who wish to undermine it by using it as a tool to misdirect, spread misinformation, create uncertainty and doubt, do harm to the cause.
What do the Sale Advertisements tell us
One thing is for sure. The three Advertisements offering the Forum for Sale are telling of Mark’s perception of the website as something that has a monetary value for him, an asset to be owned, to be sold, to be milked using the WikiLeaks brand. As he used to say to me ‘Google likes “WikiLeaks”‘.
Such approach comes into direct conflict with the picture of the idealist WikiLeaks supporter, flying the banners high and rallying the troops for this worthy cause, that he trumpeted to the world for so long, as “the owner of the WikiLeaks-Forum.com, the owner of support-julian-assange.com”. This was the picture that he presented to the world, unchallenged, for the entire 18 months I was a forum member. He dropped the mask for me in August 2012 and I left. Since then he presents himself as the disaffected WikiLeaks supporter. With this new evidence we can learn that his intentions were not sincere already from September 2011.
Our learning continues…
Resources:
[1] First Sales Advert posted 7th of September 2011 http://archive.is/OZrM9
[2] Second Sales Advert posted 14th Nov 2011 http://HpQ62
[3] Third Sales Advert posted 26th August 2012 http://archive.is/E155v
[4] Conversation with Mark 29th of December 2011 about Forum Hosting costs http://wp.me/p2MRYW-gv
[5] Conversation with Mark Fundraising for wikileaks-forum.com for VPN costs 20th September 2011 http://wp.me/p2MRYW-js
[6] Page Rank and SSL Enquiry posted 15th December 2011 http://archive.is/Q3Hq9
[7] Selling 2 to 3 Footer Links on well known PR6 Forum with 11,000indexed Pages http://archive.is/vFCn9
[8] Example of Footer Advertising Link at the WikiLeaks Discussion Forum May 2013 http://archive.is/bOyh3
What is the value of a WikiLeaks forum, to its members, to its mods, to the community it was supposed to support and what is its value to the owner. Can a monetary value be put on a dream? The final chapter in Mark’s hypocrisy:

Captured image: http://www.cabledrum.net/img/wlf_for_sale.png
So much for the ‘ideals of WikiLeaks’ he still pretends to uphold. What ideals? He has put the forum for sale to the highest bidder. It seems the WikiLeaks brand gives this asset high google rankings and steady flow traffic. No wonder WikiLeaks has called this website a fraud on the public.
What is there for sale?
A Website: http://www.wikileaks-forum.com, a blog http://www.support-julian-assange.com, a Twitter account, a Facebook page, all in a package. Hosted in Virtual Private Network paid by the Community it says on the advert (the Donation button).
So let’s not hear again the wikileaks-forum.com owner talk about the WikiLeaks ideals please, it seems he is interested in an entirely different matter here.
Original URL: https://forums.digitalpoint.com/threads/2546152/
Archived URL: http://archive.is/rgn5s
I am writing you to complain about the use of Facebook to set up inauthentic WikiLeaks Pages for the purpose of promoting a website called wikileaks-forum which is equally inauthentic. The owner of this website uses the name to attract WikiLeaks supporters to enrol, post links of internet related articles, also encouraging members to donate to the forum for Hosting costs, request assistance in running the forum as mods admins and at the same time manage and admin WikiLeaks related Facebook pages that he has created to promote the forum. His name is Mark Goeder-Tarant and his Personal Facebook ID is 1286302961.
This forum is not related to WikiLeaks and neither are the Facebook pages. By using the pages he channels traffic to his website, for which purpose exactly is not clear. He has also used the pages as a means to bully by spreading lies. It is also the case that a number of posts have been falsely promoted by bought likes.
I used to be a Volunteer Moderator at his website, I have donated money towards its hosting costs and have assisted in managing three of the Pages that he had created (WikiLeaks Cablegate, The Global Intelligence Files and FoWL) before I realised that his intentions were not truthful and I left.
I would be grateful if you looked at the facts that I present below and take down these pages that are a Fraud. The Pages in Question:
Wikileaks Cablegate
https://www.facebook.com/wikileakscablegate archive.is/NPGc5
FB ID 207230605981081
WikiLeaks: The Global Intelligence Files
https://www.facebook.com/WikiLeaksTheGlobalIntelligenceFiles archive.is/g6L6g
FB ID 360491143985667
FoWL
https://www.facebook.com/WikiLeaks.FoWl archive.is/GBdGu
FB ID 363067913731557
Friends Of Wikileaks(FoWL)
https://www.facebook.com/FriendsOfWikileaksFowl archive.is/cjW5f
FB ID 353258984743187
wikileaks-forum.com
https://www.facebook.com/wikileaksforum http://archive.is/TmMIi
FB ID 100989556660994
The Wikileaks Supporters Forum Open Community
https://www.facebook.com/wikileakssupportersforum archive.is/Qu4bL
FB ID 161833024009325
WikiLeaks Deutschland / Germany
https://www.facebook.com/wikileaksdeutschland archive.is/G2bXU
FB ID 110338505704527
Wikileaks Plus D – The Kissinger Cables
https://www.facebook.com/WikileaksPlusDTheKissingerCables http://archive.is/ldBem
FB ID 151497241692891
Sunshine Press
https://www.facebook.com/WikiLeaks.SunshinePress archive.is/5j912
FB ID 109174195782437
Aggregate Likes 182,981
1. Evidence that the Pages are Inauthentic:
a. From the WikiLeaks Website: (http://wikileaks.org/Supporters.html) Statement about the Forum
The “WikiLeaks Forum” is not run or endorsed by WikiLeaks and has no connection to WikiLeaks whatsoever.
b. From the WikiLeaks Twitter Feed: (https://twitter.com/wikileaks/statuses/387193725790588928 )
“This letter* and Facebook group are fabrications. The group is controlled by ‘Mark’ and has nothing to do with FoWL. It is a fraud on the public, as is wikileaks-forum.”
c. The above mentioned pages have all the appearance of authenticity. The logos, relevant content regularly updated, a list of relevant recommended ‘Likes’. In some cases they even state to be an ‘Official Facebook Page’ of the organisation they are dedicated to.
See here for example: http://archive.is/w4Nyk in the ‘About’ page For Sunshine press it says and I quote:
Official Facebook Page– The Sunshine Press (Wikileaks), is an international non-profit organization funded by: Human Rights Campaigners Investigative Journalists Technologists Lawyers The general public http://www.sunshinepress.org
But I know that this is not so, this is certainly not an authentic page in as far as it is not an Official page for Sunshine press. It is controlled by Mark and it has absolutely nothing to do with anyone else. You can see for yourself here: http://archive.is/5j912 that most posts relate to the wikileaks-forum.com
In fact most of the pages above were set up in the same manner till at some point in Spring 2012 the message went round to his mods/admins that we should change all of them into ‘Community pages’ which certainly happened.
Still, even as Community pages they are fraudulent as they are not WikiLeaks supportive pages, the only one they support is Mark, his website wikileaks-forum.com and his blog support-julian-assange.com. You do not have to go further than the very first page of the links above, the very first posts there, to see clearly of what I am talking about.
Furthermore, the pages have become means of cyber-bullying. For your information, I analyse an example of this bullying that involved myself here: https://greekemmy.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=1079&action=edit
So, I conclude: The Facebook Pages that are controlled by Mark are not authentic, they are not supportive, not authorised and from what I know the only reason they exist is to channel Internet Traffic to the websites http://www.wikileaks-forum.com and the http://www.support-julian-assange.com
2. The Purchase of Fake ‘Likes’
Further irregular behaviour includes the purchase of Fake ‘Likes for the posts in these pages. Here are some examples, I have analysed in detail the first and just list other examples you may wish to investigate.
Facebook Page: wikileaks-forum.com FB ID 100989556660994
https://www.facebook.com/wikileaksforum/posts/527499027343376 archived here: http://archive.is/c0dFs
The FB post was ‘Liked’ 153 times. It is again surprising. Despite the fact that the page has 33,971 Likes, most posted links normally receive less than 10 likes.
I analysed all 153 likes for this post and I found that :
151 Facebook Accounts Names were from the Indian Subcontinent, only 2 were not.
103 Facebook Accounts that had ‘Liked’ the post did not actually list the Wikileaks-forum page or any WikiLeaks related pages in their “Likes” List, which was publicly visible and accessible, So how did these account get to see this FB post?
44 Facebook Accounts that had ‘Liked’ the post did not have a publicly visible’Likes’ List.
Only 6 Facebook Accounts included WikiLeaks related Pages in the ‘Likes’ List.
The post was shared only twice.
By looking at these inconsistencies described above I conclude that the Likes are fake.
Other examples for you to investigate:
Facebook Page: FoWL FB ID 363067913731557
Post: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLeaks.FoWl/posts/597162466988766 archived here: http://archive.is/YRB2N
The post received 309 likes which is a remarkable number considering that the total likes for the page is 2,986
One has to wonder how such high number of Likes have been so quickly accumulated on this particular post.
If one examines the postings on the page the last 6 months the maximum a post was liked was 21 times with most posts receiving from 1-10 likes.
Facebook Page: WikiLeaks Cablegate FB ID 207230605981081
https://www.facebook.com/wikileakscablegate/posts/520604787976993 archived here: http://archive.is/ENQHs
https://www.facebook.com/wikileakscablegate/posts/511831705520968 archived here: http://archive.is/URdgK
If you wish any further information on the subject please do not hesitate to contact me directly
Emmy Butlin.