To download the A5 size colour Flyer please click on the link: Vigil Flyer 16 March 2015 and have a little patience 🙂
greekemmy
A Journey In Support of WikiLeaks and Julian Assange
recent posts
- Photos of undercover policemen and woman involved with Julian Assange violent arrest at the Ecuadorian Embassy – some resources
- 2023 can be a winner for the freedom of Julian Assange, anything else is unthinkable.
- 5/8/21 – #The IntoleranceNetwork WikiLeaks Release and Partner’s Articles
- The Assange Case against UC Global Spying in Spanish Courts – Machine Translation.
- Twitterstorm 6/04/2020 8pm London time in support of Julian #Assange, publisher of #WikiLeaks
about
-
Post first published 13/03/2015
The new offensive by Mark Goeder Tarant against WikiLeaks in twitter includes misuse of Twitter Guideline Rules to file privacy complaints against the organisation and its supporters.
MGT founder and operator of the falsely advertised “The WikiLeaks Supporters Forum” at wikileaks-forum.com website has used the pseudo forum’s twitter account @wikileaks_forum to report to Twitter privacy violations he claimed were against Twitter Rules. He targeted @Cabledrummer first over the publication of this picture of himself from a year ago, in Frankfurt, where he was captured photographing people attending a protest against the dolphins’s slaughter in Taiji, Japan.
This photo was cropped and circulated in February 2014 by @Cabledrummer account (long documenting the anti-WikiLeaks operation of the pseudo wikileaks-forum.com) putting a face to a name to the shadowy owner of the pseudo forum. Soon after it was tweeted by Mark Goeder Tarant via the forum’s account with all the appropriate hashtags.
MGT also posted it at the pseudo forum wikileaks-forum.com in an attempt to degrade and discredit @Cabledrummer as a stalker, claiming Cabledrummer had attended the event, stalked and photographed MGT. Stalking is a crime, falsely claiming someone has committed a crime is also a crime so almost a year ago Cabledrummer filed a criminal complaint with German Police who investigated the matter and referred it to a judge. The definition of Boomerang?
Almost a year later determined to silence @Cabledrummer MGT falsely reported him for privacy violations. Remarkably Twitter permanently suspended @Cabledrummer. And I say remarkably because the photo is in public domain in FB public pages, as well videos of the whole event with MGT in it, for more than a year (see resources below).
In solidarity I changed my Avatar to a bunny. In vengeful glee MGT adopted the image for the forum’s twitter account
How long did it take him to realise he was breaking Twitter Copyright Rules himself and could be immediately suspended (as he had been suspended prior to loosing his previous Twitter background to violating Twitter copyright rules ), and he changed it back.
Here is a running account of who was targeted by this technique:
@Cabledrummer first suspended then un-suspended, followed by permanently suspended – un-suspended again. Then suspended again over new claim over supposedly violating Twitter privacy rules. 19/03/2015 Cabledrummer Unsuspended
@blumo0n – still suspended
@jaraparilla / @garymlord – suspended, now reinstated
@wikileaks – received suspending threat, defended by lawyers, it was dropped.
@BellaMagnani – suspended, now unsuspended.Update Sat 14 March 2015:
These are the pseudo wikileaks_forum 10 tweets saying accounts have been reported to twitter :
@Cabledrummer 24/02/2015 https://archive.today/xf76N 2/03/2015 https://archive.today/bbZBv
@blumo0n 24/02/2015 https://archive.today/KOJfO
@Wikileaks 11/03/2015 https://archive.today/X4Bkt 12/03/2015 https://archive.today/BEcOD
@BellaMagnani 11/03/2015 https://archive.today/8cum3
One of these not clear which: @AnnieDarkhorse @greekemmy @Cabledrum @wikileaks 11/03/2015 https://archive.today/5cY8B
@iResist4Evr 11/03/2015 https://archive.today/8trYj
@jaraparilla 11/03/2015 https://archive.today/IYBmA and https://archive.today/mi0IA@hazelpress 15/03/2015 https://archive.today/hX6I6
Update Sunday 15th March 2015:
If you want to do somthing about the situation please support this petition:
“@Support Pls Investigate @ wikileaks_forum misuse of @Twitter Rules to harass #WLsup”
by signing with your twitter handle here http://twitition.com/hb2q6
Resources:
The famous public photo: https://archive.today/hbjuA
The pseudo-forum adopting CD bunny https://archive.today/MAtgs
Other public photos from the event: https://archive.today/hbjuA https://archive.today/tknJ7 https://archive.today/EuVNo https://archive.today/Blbid
MGT posting his image on the forum https://archive.today/zmzBm https://archive.today/SVYqc (now edited out: https://archive.today/tzf4f)
The video MGT took on the day posted at his ‘forum’ now made private: https://archive.today/pk3ls
MGT and his helpers has lots to say about this post and what he is up to: https://archive.today/ZoSCk and https://archive.today/X3uxh
And a video of the event: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxOISPoxJus -
Wikileaks: Η Τουρκία ετοιμάζει θερμό επεισόδιο στο Οικόπεδο 12
10 Μαρτίου 2012, 16:34 EET
sigmalive/news247Αποφασισμένη εμφανίζεται η Άγκυρα να εμποδίσει την παραγωγή αερίου σύμφωνα με τις αποκαλύψεις του Wikileaks που δημοσιεύουν “ΤΑ ΝΕΑ”.
Όπως αναφέρει το δημοσίευμα, η Τουρκία δήλωνε αποφασισμένη ακόμα για στρατιωτική αντιπαράθεση στην Ανατολική Μεσόγειο όταν η Κυπριακή Δημοκρατία φθάσει στο στάδιο παραγωγής του φυσικού αερίου από το Οικόπεδο 12.
Αυτές τις πληροφορίες είχε η Stratfor τον περασμένο φθινόπωρο όταν δοκίμαζε τα νεύρα Κύπρου, Ισραήλ και Ελλάδας, προκαλώντας ένταση στην περιοχή.
Μάλιστα, σύμφωνα με το δημοσίευμα το οποίο επικαλείται το Wilkileaks, οι αναλυτές της εταιρείας πίστευαν ότι η τόσο η Λευκωσία όσο και η Αθήνα, εκμεταλλεύθηκαν τη ρήξη των τουρκοϊσραηλινών σχέσεων για να συμμαχήσουν με το Ισραήλ.
“To Ισραήλ χαίρεται που βλέπει την Τουρκία να πιέζεται”, επισημαίνουν οι αναλυτές της Stratfor.
“Η επίσημη πολιτική της Τουρκίας είναι να περιμένει μέχρι η Κύπρος να μπει στο στάδιο παραγωγής για να αναλάβει αποφασιστική δράση. Μια στρατιωτική αντιπαράθεση είναι πιθανή μέχρι τότε, παρ’ όλο που οι ναυτικές διενέξεις θα λάβουν χώρα με συγκρατημένο τρόπο. Αυτό είναι παράξενο, και παρ’ ότι μπορεί να δείξουν αυτοσυγκράτηση, υπάρχει χώρος για λάθος υπολογισμούς και λάθη που θα μπορούσαν να κλιμακώσουν την κατάσταση”, γράφει αναλυτής της Stratfor, απηχώντας “τουρκικές ενεργειακές πηγές” στα τέλη του περασμένου Σεπτεμβρίου, την ώρα που η Άγκυρα είχε έτοιμο σχέδιο προκειμένου να στήσει σκηνικό έντασης στην περιοχή.
Ο αναλυτής εκτιμούσε πως η Τουρκία ήθελε περισσότερο στόχο να δείξει ότι δεν είναι διατεθειμένη να μείνει άπραγη στην περιοχή, διασφαλίζοντας τα συμφέροντά της.
“Οποιαδήποτε τουρκική αδυναμία θα μπορούσε να ενθαρρύνει την Ελλάδα να προωθήσει τις απαιτήσεις της στο Αιγαίο, κάτι που θα ανάγκαζε την Τουρκία να παρέμβει δίχως δισταγμό. Αν η Τουρκία μείνει άπραγη στην ελληνοκυπριακή κίνηση, η Ελλάδα θα είχε περισσότερες δυνατότητες να κάνει κάτι τέτοιο”.
Μάλιστα σε άλλο σημείο της αναφοράς του ο Τούρκος αναλυτής επανέρχεται στο σενάριο πολεμικής αντιπαράθεσης, υποστηρίζοντας πως “η Τουρκία μπορεί να ανεχθεί την κυπριακή φάση των ερευνών, αλλά η πολιτική της είναι να εμποδίσει την παραγωγή με κάθε κόστος. Η πραγματική πρόκληση για την Τουρκία θα προκύψει όταν η Κύπρος φτάσει στη φάση παραγωγής, αν στο μεταξύ δεν βρεθεί ένας συμβιβασμός ανάμεσα στις δύο πλευρές”.
Δυσφορία για τις διμερείς συμφωνίες ΑΟΖ
Μεταξύ άλλων, ειδικός αναλυτής αναφέρεται στον ενεργειακό ανταγωνισμό Τουρκίας-Κύπρου ενώ με αφορμή την είδηση ότι τουρκικά ερευνητικά πλοία κατευθύνονται προς τα κατεχόμενα σημειώνει πως πρέπει να επαληθεύσουν εάν έχουν στείλει φρεγάτες ή όχι.
“Αυτό θα προσδιορίσει αν θα δούμε να κλιμακώνεται σε κάτι πιο σοβαρό”, αναφέρει χαρακτηριστικά.
Μάλιστα εκφράζει τη δυσφορία του για το γεγονός ότι η Κυπριακή Δημοκρατία δεν έχει εξουσία στο βόρειο τμήμα του νησιού, προχώρησε σε διμερείς συμφωνίες ΑΟΖ με τους γείτονές της.
Τονίζει δε πως η Κύπρος αδειοδότησε σε πρώτη φάση μόνο το Οικόπεδο 12 επειδή συνορεύει με το Ισραήλ ώστε να εκμεταλλευθεί τη ρήξη στον άξονα Τελ- Αβίβ- Άγκυρας.
Η αντίδραση της Κυβέρνησης
Κύκλοι του προεδρικού ανέφεραν στο Σίγμα ότι οι αποκαλύψεις αυτές δείχνουν την ανάγκη η Κυπριακή Δημοκρατία να οχυρωθεί πολιτικά, βάζοντας στο παιχνίδι μεγάλες και ισχυρές χώρες, ενόψει του δεύτερου γύρου αδειοδότησης και ότι οι πολιτικοί πρέπει να διαχειριστούν τα ζητήματα αυτά. Η απάντηση αυτή αφήνει σαφείς αιχμές για την αντιπαράθεση Κυβέρνησης- Βουλής για το ζήτημα της διαχείρισης των θεμάτων που άπτονται των υδρογονανθράκων.
-
A Julian Assange interview with RTS and the Swiss Press, February 2015
Transcript:
A: It’s been quite a lot of change in five years, putting it mildly. For WikiLeaks the organisation, extremely interesting period […] a lot to be proud of. We’ve managed to survive a quite serious battle with the United States, over our publications, and for me personally […] I’ve been detained now for almost five years in the United Kingdom without charge, and that’s been difficult period for me and my family. On the other hand, my work continues and WikiLeaks as an organisation continues.
A: It’s quite a surreal situation. There is various types of Lamborghinies, that occasionally go past with this new rich Arab class that lives in this part of London, even there are Felt, black felt Lamborghinies, gold Lamborghinies etc. But more, the biggest issue for us, is the surveillance of this embassy. The UK admits to spending more than £10 million now just on the police surveillance.
A: This one is occurring right now, yes most probably, we do see that there are surveillance teams in the buildings opposite, interestingly, you spoke about Harrods. Harrods is working in collaboration with the British survellance effort, where we have not only seen that personally, because we know, we can see [pointing] this building, that one there is owned by Harrods, that one there is owned by Harrods, but we managed to legally get out documentation from within Harrods proving this use of the Harrods buildings by the surveillance effort against this Embassy.
A: Let’s not think about that, but even getting doctors in is quite a difficult thing, and dentists, because they say their insurance does not cover Ecuador, if they are British doctors.
A: I think an arrangement with United States, if Hilary gets in, is quite unlikely. Hilary was Secretary of State during our big conflict and I think the US will probably thry to keep things going forever. That’s said we can, you know, increase the political cost for continuing on the investigation, but it’s in their nature to look like they never lose, similarly, here in the UK it’s going to require some kind of technical mechanism to avoid… saving face.
A: T Think there’d be change for everyone in a way that won’t be positive,having dealt with Hilary extensively. She is, you know, quite a hawkish, even a very hawkish figure, but, she is from the Democratic Party, so, she would eliminate the opposition that you would normally see in a Democratic party to a Republican figure as president, and so, that means there would be very little restraints in relation to the American adventurism that we’ve seen even in the last eight years under Obama.
A: It is something that is difficult for me. It is something that is much more difficult for my children and family members. In some ways, one must, if you believe in something, and you want to see it occur, you have to pay a price, just like if you want to buy a house, you have to pay a price, similarly, in political philosophy you must pay prices if you believe in something.
A: We live in a modern system. It is possible depending on the shifts in the US politics that I would be sentenced to death, probably not, but that does not mean there is a risk of a sort of living death. In the United States there is something called SAMS [Special Administrative Measures] and for National Security cases, they put people in SAMS restrictions which is, you are incommunicado detention. So even if you communicate something to the public through your lawyer the lawyer goes to prison and this has happened in the United States.
A: Of course one dreams about these kinds of things…you can make bets, like there is a betting agency… you can make bets whether I am going to leave in a helicopter or a tunnel or a car but actually we were joking about this, we should make some kind of investment fund cause if we can know how I will leave then we can rig the bet.
Resources:
1]. The video link for this part of the interview: http://tp.srgssr.ch/p/rts/embed?urn=urn:rts:video:6582416
2]. A Julian Assange interview with RTS and the Swiss Press, February 2015 Clubhttp://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://www.rts.ch/info/monde/6582281-julian-assange-craint-la-mort-ou-la-mise-au-secret-aux-etats-unis.html&prev=search
3]. Special administrative measure http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_administrative_measure
4]. Julian Assange: “Este posibil sa fiu condamnat la moarte” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1hIagOicRU
5]. Meaning of ‘hawkish’ :”A person who favors military force or action in order to carry out foreign policy.” or “One who demonstrates an actively aggressive or combative attitude, as in an argument.” http://www.thefreedictionary.com/hawkish
6]. Julian Assange: “There is a risk that I am condemned to death” https://archive.today/aELG6
-
No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land. To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.
When Magna Carta principles fail……………….
Then there is Asylum
But BBC4 in ‘Taking Liberties’ season celebrating 800 years of Magna Carta is choosing to produce a satire called ‘Asylum’.
Written by a man who tweets:
So it seems at the BBC when Magna Carta fails then, there is ‘Asylum’. But, alas, no hope for the persecuted but ridicule. There is clear perversion in the meaning of words and the values reflected at this state broadcast.
Maybe there are times when satire is not satire, it’s propaganda.
In the UK, £10 million is wasted on an expensive Metropolitan Police Embassy stakeout which is ludicrous. The UK is already in contempt of International Law on Non-refoulement (which forbids the rendering of a true victim of persecution to their persecutor) by not granting Safe Passage to Ecuador for Julian Assange.
Instead the UK wants to send him to Sweden on the pretext of questioning on allegations, when a visit by the Swedish Prosecutor towards that end would suffice to progress the case.
Sweden on the other hand has just changed its Constitution to allow it to extradite publishers who reveal Sweden’s Military partners war crimes. Let’s not forget Sweden has assisted the US war effort in Afghanistan.
Related:
Magna Carta: an introduction http://www.bl.uk/magna-carta/articles/magna-carta-an-introduction#sthash.CRQPzgU5.dpuf
Statement of the Government of the Republic of Ecuador on the asylum request of Julian Assange http://wlcentral.org/node/2958
Nick Clegg Tells Julian Assange To Shut Up And Go To Sweden http://www.buzzfeed.com/jimwaterson/julian-assange-legal-threat-embassy
Sweden changed its constitution to extradite publishers https://twitter.com/BellaMagnani/status/564383180493684736
-
UK’s Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg (LBC Radio Thursday 5th Feb 2015) :
“Imagine the frustration of the Swedish government – hardly an illiberal rogue state. This is a country of impeccable democratic credentials with a well-respected judicial system”
But Sweden’s representatives believe in indefinite detention of uncharged suspects, hardly a liberal approach to administering justice, neither very democratic if you ask me. Unless of course, Justice and Democracy excludes all those who are called Julian Assange:
At the end of the Universal Periodic Review the head of the Swedish delegation to the UPR, Annika Söder, state secretary for political affairs at Sweden’s foreign ministry, said that:
Annika Söder: We find this exercise extremely useful, and we will bring all the conversations back home to see how we can improve, I think I will stop there and ask if there are any questions
Question: What is the government doing to resolve the situation of Julian Assange?
Annika Söder: This is a very complex matter in which the government can only do a few things. We are aware of Mr. Assange’s being in the embassy of Ecuador and we hope that there will be ways to deal with the legal process in one way or the other. But this is up to the legal authorities to respond.”
Question: Is there any deadline for the prosecution?
Annika Söder: Now you are asking somebody that is not completely updated on deadlines, no, my colleagues are saying no, there is no deadline.
Sarah Harrison of WikiLeaks then approached Anders Rönquist, The director-general of legal affairs in Sweden’s foreign ministry, for some questions:
Anders Rönquist: […] a possibility to have a person who is suspected of crimes to have that person detained until the charges have been made and he is facing the court.
Sarah Harrison: and there is no limit on the time you can detain somebody without those charges
Anders Rönquist: No there is no limit
Sarah Harrison: and that’s ok in a human rights aspect?
Anders Rönquist: Yeah, yes it is.
Sarah Harrison: To detain somebody indefinitely before you charge them?
Anders Rönquist: Not more time than it is necessary for, to have established the facts.
Sarah Harrison: You don’t have a limitation on that…time to..
Anders Rönquist: No we don’t, no, and there is no obligation under Human Rights Law to fixed maximum length of detainment.
Sarah Harrison: Ok
Anders Rönquist: Ok, Thank you.
Related:
Nick Clegg In Spat With Julian Assange, Could Face Legal Action http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/02/06/nick-clegg-in-spat-with-assange-could-face-legal-action_n_6632522.html
Glimmer of Hope for Assange http://www.ipsnews.net/2015/01/glimmer-of-hope-for-assange/
No Global Norm Exists Requiring Recognition of Diplomatic Asylum http://sputniknews.com/politics/20150204/1017793309.html
-
Julian Assange was granted asylum by the Republic of Ecuador in August 2012 due to the ongoing attempts by the US government to bring a “conspiracy to commit espionage” prosecution against him over his role as the editor of WikiLeaks. Sweden and the UK continue to obstruct Mr Assange’s asylum.
It has now surfaced that the United States government via the NSA and FBI used ‘conspiracy’ and ‘espionage’ warrants carrying up to 45 years in prison to order Google to release personal communication data of WikiLeaks staffers. Google reports it fought the gagging order imposed on them since early 2011, unsuccessfully. Only a partial lift of this order has allowed Google to communicate in December 2014 to three WL staffers that they complied to such warrants in 2012.
From the WikiLeaks press release on the Warrant to Google:
“Once an offence is alleged in relation to a journalist or their source, the whole media organisation, by the nature of its work flow, can be targeted as alleged ‘conspiracy’. Julian Assange, WikiLeaks Editor-in-Chief said: ‘WikiLeaks has out endured everything the Obama administration has thrown at us and we will out endure these latest “offences” too.’
The alleged offences are:
* Espionage: 18 U.S.C. § 793(d) – imprisonment up to 10 years
* Conspiracy to commit espionage: 18 U.S.C. § 793(g) – imprisonment up to 10 years
* The theft or conversion of property belonging to the United States government: 18 U.S.C. § 641 – imprisonment up to 10 years
* Violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 – imprisonment up to 10 years
* (general) Conspiracy: 18 U.S.C. § 371 – imprisonment up to 5 years” -
There is no justice if your name is Assange.
We read today that Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg was in a spat with Julian Assange, and could face legal action
It’s not the fist time Mr Clegg, has put his foot in it over the Assange case.
On 19th of June 2014, the second Anniversary of the WikiLeaks founder seeking sanctuary inside the Ecuadorian Embassy, at the same LBC programme, Mr Clegg was clearly surprised to be asked about him and got into a real muddle.
He suggested Julian Assange ‘should be facing justice in his own country’ then proceeded with the proverbial ‘Sweden is not a banana republic’. So he was under the impression Assange was Swedish!!!
Then again he demonstrated his ignorance of the details of the case by saying: ” they will give him a fair trial in line with Swedish law’. He was clearly ignorant of, or chose to ignore that the case is in preliminary investigation stage, he is sought for questioning, there has been no decision by the Swedish judiciary whether to charge him or not, which would determine whether the case went to trial.
Mr Clegg’s disappointed expression whilst listening to a question about Julian Assange He has not learned much during the last six months that have ensued has he? He put his foot into it again saying Assange faced charges in Sweden (09:20 min).
WikiLeaks issued a statement from Julian Assange setting the record straight, protesting at the injustice, invoking Magna Carta and explaining he was seeking legal advice with regards to legal action against Mr Clegg for defamation.
The latter instead of apologising or issuing a correction, which he could have easily done, he instead chose to attack the victim of his error with arrogance and prejudice, calling him self-publicist for protesting his innocence and seeking the protection of the law. This came from a man who holds one of the highest offices in the land, towards a man who is under the protection of political asylum.
It seems there is no justice if your name is Assange.
www.justice4assange.com By the way, if indefinite detention without charge is not characteristic of a banana republic, I don’t know what is. Here is Sarah Harrison of WikiLeaks getting the views of Anders Rönquist, Director-General for Legal Affairs at the Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs on the matter:
You can listen to the complete 19/06/2014 Q&A with Nick Clegg here at about 32:40 minutes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9t60zVLXjY
Transcript of the Q&A 19/06/2014:
Jim Curran: Good morning Nick, I have a brief request for you. I am requesting you to contact foreign secretary and ask him to ask the Swedish police to come and question Julian Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy or via video link. This would save tax payers an awful lot of money, and free up the police for more important matters.
Nick Ferrari: Today is the second year since Mr Assange sought sanctuary at the embassy. The policing bill, deputy prime minister, is at £6.5 million.
Mr Clegg: Look, I understand people’s frustration about this mounting bill that is landing on our lap. Julian Assange, if I understand correctly, for perfectly good reasons is…should be facing justice in his own home country.
Nick Ferrari: He is frightened he will be abducted or somehow swept off to the US.
Nick Clegg: Look, Sweden is not a banana republic, Sweden as far as I can make out is a pretty civilised country with a pretty sophisticated justice system, I am assuming they will give him a fair trial in line with Swedish law.
Nick Ferrari: What about the idea of a video link or something like that.
Nick Clegg: I have no idea whether that… Jim, I have no idea whether that would work, I am not a Swedish prosecutor but I do accept that the best thing would be for Julian Assange to, basically, put himself into the hands of the Swedish judicial system, not into the hands, if you like, of the British police, the bill of which is footed by the British taxpayer.
-
Google… as an information pied piper from defence contractor SAIC On September 15, 2014 Julian Assange did an ‘Ask me Anything’ Question and Answer session at Reddit Discussion platform about his book “When Google Met WikiLeaks“.
I submitted a question which received an answer that I share below for the benefit of those politicians, business people as well as consumers of Google products, that are likely to come into contact with this multinational company in Greece.
His book reveals the close relationship between the US government and Google. His answer below leaves no doubt of the dark intentions of the organisation, describing Google reps as an information pied piper from defence contractor SAIC (now Leidos).
Find Original record at: https://storify.com/m_cetera/reddit-ama-julian-assange References:
Pied piper: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pied_Piper_of_Hamelin
SAIC (now Leidos) defence contractor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leidos
For more see the video and Transcript here:
BBC Interview with Julian Assange Sep 2014 (video & Transcript) http://atomic-temporary-41199926.wpcomstaging.com/2014/09/22/bbc-news-julian-assange-on-google-and-his-difficult-situation-transcript/
Article in Greek: https://iguru.gr/2015/01/28/when-google-met-wikileaks/
greekemmy 