• At the time of writing 19/07/2017, the account had 2918 tweets, out of which 1757 were Retweets, and out of the remaining 1161 , 591 were replies to someone else’s tweet and 570 original Tweets.

    The Retweets included:

    552 RTs from fake account @Real_Assange (Fake) done at the time @JulianAssunge account’s handle was @Real_Assange (154 of those were re-tweets its own replies / 398 were re-tweets of its own tweets). Two other fake accounts get under 15 re-tweets also: @JulianAsange_ and @JulianAssunge

    The Right-Wing Retweets: From @Cernovich National security reporter 106, from @realDonaldTrump POTUS 46, from @JackPosobiec Author of Citizens for Trump 34, from @MarkDice Media Analyst youtuber 29, from @mitchellvii Host of YourVoice™ 28, from @PrisonPlanet Infowars editor 22.

    The original @JulianAssange and @KimDotKom accounts get less than 25 re-tweets as well.

    The Replies focused on accounts like Julian Assange, WikiLeaks, Donald Trump and Hilary Clinton, Chelsea Clinton and Donna Brazil to mention a few of the frequently featured.

    Among the 570 original tweets Clinton was mentioned 84 times, Fake News 74 times, CNN 52, Seth Rich 46, Russia 18.

    I asked long time WL supporter Bella Magnani what do these impostors do. She brought forward a few examples to define the Modus Operandi

    Archived here: http://archive.is/bDRef (Tweet originally made under different handle @Real_Assange)

    From @BellaMagnani:

    Pick a high-profile target likely to appeal to Trump base. Tweet at them with your fake news (NB. the fake news is selected so it WILL be damaging if read as coming from JA – eg. Pizzagate, Podesta as pedophile, anti-semetic attacks on Jewish Anti-Defamation League, etc) so any replies to your tweet will also flood the target’s mentions (hence Donald Trump and Clinton are so often ‘replied to’ in Real_Assange tweets).

    Tweet archived here: http://archive.is/yyD0p

    From @BellaMagnani again:

    Account claims “free speech” but I’d say its targets/word choices are selected to create maximum distrust / loss of credibility to JA

    I asked the same question to another long term WL supporter. Here is what was said.

    From Stateless Ænima‏ @blumo0n:

    When engaging/ speaking truth to power, one diminishes power. However, these impersonation accounts are powerless trolls seeking to subsume the gravitas of WikiLeaks & by doing so, diffuse it’s reach.Engaging these accounts only assists their mission. Report, reveal, but refrain from engagement.

    Finally responding to a call to report impostors, another of our friends hit the nail on the head:

    And I could not agree more! So let’s keep Twitter busy, report the impostors 🙂

  • A lot of time and therefore money is being expended in creating Assange impostor accounts for Black Propaganda. Please consider to report them to twitter for impersonation to get them suspended then block. Although the Black Propaganda teams working on the impostor projects can create new impostor accounts, eventually with every suspension their job is becoming more difficult as handles suspended cannot be used again.

    Impostor Account Example 1:

    WikiLeaks @ JullianAsange – changed handle to @ _AssangeJulian

    Twitter Timelines archived here: http://archive.is/zvPll and http://archive.is/gKtDb

    The second handle has been suspended. The first has been re-used under a new account created on the 28th of June (to reserve the name, so no-one else uses it) http://archive.is/QErgX (using Austrian footballer’s Julian Erhart photo as an Avatar) ID 880100132380786689

    Impostor Account Example 2 (31/08/17 Update):

    Julian Assange @Real_Assange changed to  Julian Assange @JulianAssunge and then to @JulianAssanged adding a diamond symbol for verification, then changed again to @Julien_Assange and then to @JuliannAssange, @RealAssange always the same twitter  ID 860223427180773376.

    Twitter Timelines archived here: http://archive.is/zU5o0,
    http://archive.is/s2TWN and http://archive.is/Q0yYf

    As the account changes handles any search for the pages produce “page does not exist” whilst the current page retains all the tweets and followers of the historic accounts from the day of creation. This is the way the account handlers avoid being suspended by twitter, leaving room to re-cycle the same handles in the future.

    Twitter Timelines archived here: http://archive.is/3KrKq and http://archive.is/FV5Dr -https://web.archive.org/web/20170803222503/https:/twitter.com/Julien_Assange – http://archive.is/vSsab
    Archived http://archive.is/lSTVZ and http://archive.is/s5vRK

    Impostor Account Example 3:

    Wikileaks @WiliLeak ID 887461508267073536

    Timeline archived here: http://archive.is/YEThc

    Wikileaks @WikileaksTeam ID 887477583595655168

    Twitter Timeline archived here: http://archive.is/IljF0

    WL supporters have been busy reporting the account for impersonation, let’s hope Twitter suspends the account soon.

    Useful Resources:

    1.] Twelve Reasons Why You Should NOT Delete a Disused Twitter Account https://twirpz.wordpress.com/2016/03/08/twelve-reasons-why-you-should-not-delete-a-disused-twitter-account/ and http://archive.is/Aes9g

    2.] How To Find Twitter Users’ Previous Usernames https://twirpz.wordpress.com/2015/06/16/how-to-find-twitter-users-previous-usernames/ and http://archive.is/dhMcT

    3.] How to Report Impersonating account in Twitter: https://support.twitter.com/forms/impersonation

    Happy Reporting!

    Previous version archived here http://archive.is/ATFsL

  • Original URL: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/tragedy-has-forced-me-to-move-on-from-julian-assange-q5mzgjq9g

    Tragedy has forced me to move on from Julian Assange

    Being a ghostwriter for the controversial WikiLeaks exile was a chastening experience for Andrew O’Hagan. The Grenfell Tower fire has given him a new sense of purpose

    Stephen McGinty
    June 25 2017, 12:01am,

    The Sunday Times
    O’Hagan will take a break from writing to appear at the Edinburgh Book Festival in August

    Andrew O’Hagan lives in an arts and crafts-style house in Primrose Hill, northwest London, where he works in an upstairs study. It is furnished with matching sofas, a large fireplace, overhung by an oil painting once dismissed by a previous girlfriend as a “bleak Scots puddle” and not one, nor two, but three different writing desks.

    While there are few writers in Britain as skilled as the novelist, essayist and author of superlative non-fiction, it cannot be explained by furnishings alone. Yet each desk has a different purpose. “One’s for fiction, one’s for non-fiction and the other is for general admin,” he explains with a chuckle.

    The fiction desk is where Caledonian Road is slowly taking shape, a huge state-of-the-nation novel, inspired by the street in London where O’Hagan first lived, and which, when eventually published, will be his sixth novel, after the Booker-nominated success of The Illuminations, Our Fathers and The Life and Opinions of Maf the Dog, the finest novel ever written in the voice of Marilyn Monroe’s Scottish terrier.

    Yet the non-fiction desk has scarcely lain fallow. The Secret Life, his latest book, published earlier this month, is a collection of three long essays about the internet’s landscape of subterfuge, deceit and revelations including stories on the potential founder of bitcoin; how O’Hagan reanimated a dead man’s identity into the new online world, and his 27,000-word account of life as the ghostwriter of Julian Assange.

    First published in the London Review of Books, the essay chronicles O’Hagan’s attempts to wrestle Assange’s life onto the printed page, while growing increasingly uncomfortable by, not only his table manners — he eats lasagne by hand — but his predatory eye and messianic arrogance and indifference to those around him. A version of the book was eventually published by Canongate as an “unauthorised autobiography” and O’Hagan last saw Assange at the Ecuadorian embassy on the eve of the publication of his essay. He told Assange he wouldn’t like it. He was right.

    Today, reflecting on the experience, O’Hagan said their relationship went from “honeymoon to bad marriage” in a year. “He was basically under house arrest in Norfolk when I took up with him, then I kept seeing him for a while after he moved into the Ecuadorian embassy. For a while I was one of the last men standing. But as the taped interviews accumulated, I noticed he was lying to me. He was using me. And then I began to notice a fatal conflation he was making — pretending that his defence of himself against a possible threat under the US Espionage Act was the same as the threat posed by the two girls who accused him of rape in Sweden.

    “He simply couldn’t see how ruinous that was for him. It was a moral disaster, in my view, to not answer those questions in Sweden and clear his name. Hiding in the embassy of a nation with a questionable record on freedom of expression as a way of avoiding those questions was at best an act of cowardice. I’m afraid he lost all his moral capital by framing himself as the victim in that case. He became ludicrous. And after a few years of saying nothing I found I had been suppressing my own story for no good reason.”

    Contemplation requires a degree of reserve, and you can’t maintain that while also gibbering on Twitter
    He explains that Assange’s hatred of Hillary Clinton allowed him to be used by Russian intelligence: “Well, it’s interesting. Hillary always denounced WikiLeaks. And she’s a hawk. He hated her personally and that clouded everything. I always knew he would be fooled by his own resentment, as thoughtless people often are, and seeming to help Trump was the last nail in the coffin of his credibility.”

    O’Hagan doesn’t see a way back for Assange: “He could leave the embassy right now. But his pride would not allow him to be booked by the police and taken to Paddington Green for skipping bail. Even that would kill him. He has the damaged child’s hunger for heroic outcomes and massive personal vindication. But he won’t get it. And I feel sorry for him because, despite everything, we got on well personally and I admired the spark of idealism behind the facade. Ironically, he is, for a freedom fighter, the most trapped person I have ever met.”

    To become a sworn enemy of one of the world’s most successful hackers may explain why O’Hagan has taped over the cameras on his computers: “why make it easy” he wrote in a recent essay, discussing the CIA and MI5 programme Weeping Angel which can turn on a user’s camera remotely. His decision not to have a twitter account or official website is more measured. “I’ve never understood how writers can afford to spend time on social media or in promoting themselves online. Some of us just believe in privacy I suppose and maintaining a public self takes energy I’d rather spend on proper writing. Contemplation requires a certain degree of reserve, and you simply can’t maintain that while also gibbering on Twitter.”

    The youngest of four boys, O’Hagan was born in Glasgow in 1968 and raised in a housing estate in Kilwinning but built himself using books from the local library. His father would later chastise him for stating in interviews that there were no books in the house growing up, pointing to the telephone directory as an exhibit for the defence. O’Hagan credits his English teacher Mrs McNeil for setting him on the path to Strathclyde University: “She really saved me” he told the BBC.

    Upon graduation he moved to London, working for a magazine for blind veterans, before securing a post as editorial assistant with the London Review of Books, a position partly secured on account of the dapper suit he wore to the interview. Yet his loyalty to the LRB is resolute for it was here that his literary star first attracted the attention of the world, first with an essay written in the wake of the James Bulger case exploring his own violent behaviour and those of his friends and later what would become his first book, The Missing — an exploration of missing people, Fred West and the grim underbelly of modern Britain.

    He is now working on what may become a dark literary twin to The Missing, a non-fiction account of the Grenfell Tower fire, to be published by Faber & Faber, his time now spent speaking to survivors and building a portrait of the community. “I grew up in social housing and high-rise idealism was the subject of my first novel, Our Fathers. Every day now, and often at night, I find myself on the way to that street in west London, to work with the community, with families and servicemen and women, to find the real story of the tower.”

    O’Hagan will, however, be taking a break to spend a fortnight in Edinburgh in August, with his partner, Lindsay, and his daughter, Nell, from his relationship with India Knight. There he will be delivering a lecture at the Edinburgh International Book Festival, entitled Scotland, Your Scotland: “I think this is politically the most creative period for Scotland in just over 300 years. We have arrived at this point at different paces and in different ways, but the independence debate, whatever your preference, has fertilised the mind of the nation to a terrific degree.”

    Then O’Hagan plans to return to the privacy of his study, his desks and his words.

    The Secret Life by Andrew O’Hagan is published by Faber & Faber

  • From Youtube

    Published on Jun 1, 2017

    This week Co-Founder of WikiLeaks Julian Assange discusses the War of Leaks in DC, who has the best secret security forces around the world, and how the public largely benefits from transparency and sharing of information. Porter and Buck have a debate on what constitutes a whistleblower and the motivations behind those who come forward.

  • Tuesday 6 June 2017

    Dear Shaun Bailey, Fiona Twycross, Tom Copley, Kemi Badenoch, Caroline Pidgeon, Nicky Gavron, Sian Berry, Andrew Boff, Caroline Russell, David Kurten and Peter Whittle,

    At a time of grave sorrow for the loss of life in London due to Islamist terrorism and with MetPol cuts still very much unfolding, increasing further the risks to our safety, I am writing to you once more to highlight the plight of Julian Assange, the Editor of WikiLeaks who for the last 5 years has been trapped in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London at great expense to the London Taxpayer and great risk to his life and health.

    Perceived Foreign policy objectives keep the UK government from granting safe passage to Julian Assange to travel wherever he wishes to and enjoy the political asylum granted to him by the government of Ecuador which is his right. United Nations legal opinion published in February 2016 and confirmed in November 2016 is that he has been arbitrarily detained by the governments of Sweden and UK. Last month, in May, Sweden has stopped legally detaining him, rescinding the Swedish and as a result the European Arrest Warrant that legally detained him. Not only Sweden no longer seeks his arrest, in fact, the Swedish Prosecutor after questioning Julian Assange inside the Ecuadorian Embassy in November 2016, has now closed the preliminary investigation against him.

    Despite all of the above the MetPol has publicly stated that it seeks to arrest him for breaking his bail conditions and have an arrest warrant against him. Seeking political asylum is a right not a crime. Julian Assange sought the protection of Ecuador because he has been persecuted for his journalistic and publishing work. There is plenty of evidence that a Grand Jury investigation is amassing evidence against Julian Assange, WikiLeaks, and its staff for more than 7 years for their publishing work. Recently, in April this year, CIA Director Pompeo has unequivocally stated CIA’s determination to end the operation of WikiLeaks by any means, US Attorney Sessions soon after made public statements that he is preparing charges against Julian Assange for his journalistic work, clearly he is being persecuted over many years. It is the political asylum granted to him by Ecuador that protects him from this persecution.

    In the meanwhile, the London Taxpayer has spent millions of pounds in the surveying of the Embassy to facilitate arrest. Up until October 2015 the publicly available information for the cost of this surveillance by MetPol alone amounted to more than £12 million pounds. Since then any information about the cost of surveillance has been classified as the operation is covert and we have no idea what money is being spent on it. It is money ill spent! At a time of austerity, with police funding cuts increasing the risk of safety for Londoners, it is intolerable that the UK government which is obviously responsible for MetPol policy is throwing good money down the drain keeping Julian Assange trapped in the Embassy to serve whatever ill perceived foreign policy objectives instead of protecting the safety and security of the public at large.

    I partake in a weekly vigil outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in solidarity with Julian Assange the last five years, my colleagues and I have witnessed the police operation throughout this period. We all are London Tax payers and would rather see the police do their duty by us in their professional capacity rather than playing the spy in Embassy surveillance wasting our money at the same time as serving the ill perceived political interests of the Home Office.

    Are undercover police in operation outside the Embassy? Evidence indicates that they are. Over a period of weeks in April this year a Black Ford Mondeo with two male occupants inside, registration number AU64 BB0 remained with the engine running at all times outside number 16 HansCrescent which happens to be opposite the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, No 3 Hans Crescent and in particular opposite the entrance of Landon Place which wraps the entire side of the building, where the embassy is. The same vehicle was situated at exactly the same spot and was observed morning, afternoon and evening. Its occupants were at times of mixed gender. Parking control staff were seen dispensing parking penalty notices to public utility vans and other vehicles whilst not doing so for this vehicle. At times, taking turns one of them might leave the vehicle and walk across Hans Crescent and turn into the direction of Basil Street, where another vehicle in full MetPol markings, registration number BX66 HH0 parked throughout the time observed. See my report here: https://atomic-temporary-41199926.wpcomstaging.com/2017/04/24/are-undercover-metpol-officers-currently-o utside-the-ecuadorian-embassy-in-london-surveilling-wikileaks-julian-assang e/ Such observations make me wonder and so I ask, has the covert surveillance been subcontracted to a private police company and at what cost?

    In late 2016 the London Mayor answering a question by London Assembly member David Kurten refused to forward the costs of policing to Sweden on the bases that there was a valid European Arrest Warrant outstanding against Julian Assange. This is no longer the case. What will be his answer this time? how many policemen and women can be employed with £12 million, to keep the streets of London safe?

    Julian Assange is an innocent man, he has political asylum, he is arbitrarily detained by the UK, and London Tax Payers money is wasted to keep him trapped. Please help stop this injustice.

    I thank you for your time,

    Yours sincerely,

    Mrs Emilia Butlin JADC – Julian Assange Defence Committee, Grassroots solidarity for the WikiLeaks Editor.

  • The original article can be found at the South Londoner here: http://www.swlondoner.co.uk/julian-assange-charges-dropped/

    May 22 2017, 15:52

    Follow @SW_Londoner

    A vigil in support of Julian Assange took place outside the Ecuadorian embassy in London on Friday, hours after Sweden dropped a sexual assault investigation against him.
    The Metropolitan Police have confirmed that Mr Assange still faces arrest over breaching bail conditions should he leave the Embassy, despite the lifting of Sweden’s European Arrest Warrant.

    The 45-year-old WikiLeaks founder has been in self-imposed exile in the embassy, located in Kensington, for nearly five-years in fear of being extradited to Sweden or the United States.


    Julian Assange Solidarity activist Emmy Butlin said: “I think it’s very embarrassing for them.

    “When the Metropolitan Police, strapped for cash during austerity years, has been spending upwards of £10 million on the surveillance of this embassy.”

    The Metropolitan police scaled down its permanent presence outside the embassy, the costs of which are believed to have exceeded £12 million, in building in 2015.

    For the last five years, Ms Butlin’s group have held weekly vigils in support of Mr Assange outside the embassy on Tuesdays through Thursdays, from 3pm to 5pm.

    Addressing a crowd of journalists and supporters from the embassy balcony, Mr Assange said: “While today was an important victory, an important vindication, the war is far from over.

    “The war, the proper war, is just commencing.”

    He added: “Seven years without charge while my children grew up without me. That is not something that I can forgive. That is not something I can forget.”

    Mr Assange was held in isolation in Wandsworth Prison for 10 days, under investigation of sexual assault and rape allegations from two Swedish women, before being released on bail in December 2010.

    He entered the Ecuador embassy in June 2012, where he has since remained, and was issued an arrest warrant after failing to appear at a Westminster Magistrates Court hearing.

    Swedish prosecutors dropped the investigation on Friday after chief prosecutor Marianne Ny said there were no avenues left to pursue in a court document seen by Reuters.

    But she said the case could be reopened if Mr Assange returns to Sweden before the statute of limitations end in August 2020.

    Julian Assange solidarity activist Emmy Butlin, 47, said: “Today has every reason to be celebrated.

    “But on the other hand, it is a very sobering moment to consider that seven years of his life have been wasted due to the actions, and inaction, of a Swedish prosecutor.”

  • Dear friends of WikiLeaks!

    The Time: Today 14:00
    The Place: Outside no 10 Downing street

    Please join Veterans For Peace UK in their efforts to bring attention to the plight of Julian Assange Arbitrarily Detained by UK and Sweden.  Despite Swedish Prosecution pledging to rescind their Arrest Warrant for Julian Assange and close their Preliminary investigation case file against him, The UK government still refuses to recognise the political asylum bestowed by Ecuador in 2012 and they seek to arrest him the moment he steps outside the Ecuadorian Embassy the place of his refuge for the last five years.

    The Metropolitan Police statement today leaves no doubt where their priorities lie, it is to arrest Assange and with the following words embarrass themselves not finding the words to even describe for what exact offence will the seek to arrest him:

    Following today’s decision by the Director of Public Prosecution, Ms Marianne Ny, in relation to the Swedish authorities investigation into Julian Assange the Metropolitan Police Service’s position is:
    Westminster Magistrates’ Court issued a warrant for the arrest of Julian Assange following him failing to surrender to the court on the 29 June 2012. The Metropolitan Police Service is obliged to execute that warrant should he leave the Embassy.
    Whilst Mr Assange was wanted on a European Arrest Warrant (EAW) for an extremely serious offence, the MPS response reflected the serious nature of that crime. Now that the situation has changed and the Swedish authorities have discontinued their investigation into that matter, Mr Assange remains wanted for a much less serious offence. The MPS will provide a level of resourcing which is proportionate to that offence.
    The MPS will not comment further on the operational plan.
    The priority for the MPS must continue to be arresting those who are currently wanted in the Capital in connection with serious violent or sexual offences for the protection of Londoners.

  • Marianne Ny has today called for a press conference regarding ‘the Assange case’ she has got up in the morning, put her Perls and make up on, combed her hair, dressed and primed for her performance in front of the camera’s, she will speak in her native tongue of Swedish as if addressing her cultural allies, her people, she will speak but she will not dominate the narrative.

    In her press conference, whatever she wants to convey, good news, bad news, no news, Marianne Ny has not served Justice for Assange or anyone else.

    In the history of Justice she will remain “a persona non grata” an unacceptable or unwelcome person for using her position in the judiciary to persecute an innocent man. The depth and breadth of her power in delivering injustice and perverting the course of justice will for many years be studied in how wrong things can go when international and domestic politics and personal agenda’s give an individual in a position of power a free hand to exert it without any regard to humanity let alone Human Rights or a sense of justice that society accepts.

    When though this is the case, that international and domestic politics and personal agenda’s conspire to crush an individual and the rest of society is watching in silence then the moral responsibility also lies in the shoulders of all.

    We witness we see we read what for years now is being done to Assange in our name courtesy of Marianne Ny. We know US is after WikiLeaks, after Assange for his work. It is wrong! What do we do?

    I ask you again, What do we do when Sweden and UK are helping the CIA?